http://www.tldm.org/News5/Vatican_kneeling.htm
(1)
"My children, kneel before your God in the Eucharist. Do not stand like you stand in meeting halls, but kneel and give Him a best love and observance of honor."
Our Lady of the Roses, July 94, 1979
The following responses to questions were published in the November-December 2002 edition of Notitiae, the official publication of the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments. These responses represent the view of the Holy See on the questions of kneeling to receive Holy Communion and the right of Catholics to address concerns to the Holy See.
Congregation de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum
Prot. n. 1322/02/L
Rome, 1 July 2002
Your Excellency,
This Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments has recently received reports of members of the faithful in your Diocese being refused Holy Communion unless while standing to receive, as opposed to knee!ing. The reports state that such a policy has been announced to parishioners. There were possible indications that such a phenomenon might be some what more widespread in the Diocese, but the Congregation is unable to verify whether such is the case.
This Dicastery is confident that Your Excellency will be in a position to make a more reliable determination of the matter, and these complaints in any event provide an occasion for the Congregation to communicate the manner in which it habitually addresses this matter, with a request that you make this position known to any priests who may be in need of being thus informed.
The Congregation in fact is concerned at the number of similar complaints that it has received in recent months from various places, and considers any refusal of Holy Communion to a member of the faithful on the basis of his or her kneeling posture to be a grave violation of one of the most basic rights of the Christian faithful, namely that of being assisted by their Pastors by means of the Sacraments (Codex Iuris Canonici, canon 213).
In view of the law that "sacred ministers may not deny the sacraments to those who opportunely ask for them, are properly disposed and are not prohibited by law from receiving them" (Canon 843 §1), there should be no such refusal to any Catholic who presents himself for Holy Communion at Mass, except in cases presenting a danger of grave scandal to other believers arising out of the person's unrepresented public sin or obstinate heresy or schism, publicly professed or declared. Even where the Congregation has approved of legislation denoting standing as the posture for Holy Communion, in accordance with the adaptations permitted to the Conferences of Bishops by the Institution
Generalis Missalis Romani n. 160, paragraph 2, it has done so with the stipulation that communicants who choose to kneel are not to be denied Holy Communion on these grounds.
In fact, as His Eminence, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger has recently emphasized,
the practice of kneeling for Holy Communion has in its favor a centuries-old tradition, and
it is a particularly expressive sign of adoration,
completely appropriate in light of the true, real and substantial presence of Our Lord Jesus Christ under the consecrated species.
Given the importance of this matter, the Congregation would request that Your Excellency inquire specifically whether this priest in fact has a regular practice of refusing Holy Communion to any member of the faithful in the circumstances described above and - if the complaint is verified - that you also firmly instruct him and any other priests who may have had such a practice to refrain from acting thus in the future.
Priests should understand that the Congregation will regard future complaints of this nature with great seriousness, and if they are verified, it intends to seek disciplinary action consonant with the gravity of the pastoral abuse.
Thanking Your Excellency for your attention to this matter and relying on your kind collaboration in its regard,
Sincerely yours in Christ,
Jorge A. Cardinal Medina Estevez
Prefect
And Francesco Pio Tamburrino Archbishop
Secretary
Congregation de Cultu Divino et Disciplina Sacramentorum
Prot. n. 1322/02/L
Rome, 1 July 2002
Dear Sir,
This Congregation for Divine Worship gratefully acknowledges receipt of your letter, regarding an announced policy of denial of Holy Communion to those who kneel to receive it at a certain church.
It is troubling that you seem to express some reservations about both the propriety and the usefulness of addressing the Holy See regarding this matter. Canon 212 §2 of the Code of Canon Law states that "Christ's faithful are totally free to make known their needs, especially their spiritual ones, and
their desire to the Pastor of the Church".
The canon then continues in 3: "According to their own knowledge competence and position, they have the right, and indeed sometimes the duty, to present to the sacred Pastor; their opinions regarding those things that pertain to the good of the Church".... Accordingly, in consideration of the nature of the problem and the relative likelihood that it might or might not be resolved on the local level, every member of the faithful has the right of recourse to the Roman Pontiff either personally or by means of the Dicasteries or Tribunals of the Roman Curia.
Another fundamental right of the faithful, as noted in canon 213, is "the right to receive assistance by the sacred Pastors from the spiritual goods of the Church, especially the word of God and the Sacraments". In view of the law that "sacred" ministers may not deny the sacraments to those who opportunely ask for them, are properly disposed and are not prohibited by law from receiving them" (canon 843 §1), there should be no such refusal to any Catholic who presents himself for Holy Communion at Mass, except in cases presenting a danger of grave scandal to other believers arising out of the person's unrepresented public sin or obstinate heresy or schism, publicly professed or declared. Even where the Congregation has approved of legislation denoting standing as the posture for Holy Communion, in accordance with the adaptations permitted to the Conferences of Bishops by the Institution Generalis Romani n.160, paragraph 2, it has done so with the stipulation that communicants who choose to kneel are not to be denied Holy Communion on these grounds.
Please be assured that the Congregation takes this matter very seriously, and is making the necessary contacts in its regard. At the same time, this Dicastery continues to be ready to be of assistance if you should need to contact it again in the future.
Thanking you for your interest, and with every prayerful good wish, I am
Sincerely yours in Christ,
Monsignor Mario Marini
Undersecretary
Note:
Have you been refused Holy Communion when you knelt?
Report the incident to the Vatican's Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments: FAX: 011-39-06-698-83499
(2)
"The United States of America heads fast to a schism.
Fight, my children; do not give in to the forces of evil.
Fight the enemy with prayer."
Our Lady of the Roses, May 29,1976
The amazing Baysite prophecies ….
Your King
"Why must you insult my Son?
Can you not bend your knees?
Is He not your King?"
Our Lady, November 21, 1970
Bow Your Knees
"Remember, my child, shout it from the roof.
My Son is with you until the end of your time.
It is truly His Presence, His Real Presence, His divine Presence, His Body and His Blood.
Do not treat Him with disrespect!
Bow your knees; cover your head!
Do not chew Him!"
Our Lady; June 8, 1974
Real Presence
"You violate your sacred trust.You have taken the Body of your Creator, the Son of your God in the Trinity, and violated Him. You must do your eating at home! When you come to the great Sacrifice, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, you come in reverence. You must go down upon your knees and do penance now for the offenses to your God! ...
"As in the past, cannot you recognize the mystery of Heaven and earth?
Did not the staff of Moses turn into a serpent in the will of God?
Did not the river in Egypt turn into blood in the will of God?
And cannot God, in His will, come to you changing the bread and wine into the actual
Presence, the real Presence, the factual Presence of His Body and Blood?"
St. Michael, February 1, 1977
Honor
"All honor must be given to my Son in the Eucharist.
Man must kneel.
My Son's House is the House of God and a house of prayer, and it must not be turned into a
meeting Hall.”
Our Lady, July 25, 1979
Restore Holiness
"In the beginning I gave to you, through your prophets, the establishment of My Church upon earth. The rules were simple but now have become changed and defiled to please the carnal nature of mankind. You must restore the holiness to My House! You must bend your knees in humility and penance."
Jesus, December 31, 1975
Restore Altar Railings
"I have asked you to get down on your knees.
Clergy in my Son's House, His Church, restore the altar railings, that man may be on his knees.
For many shall crawl on their knees in desperation seeking to flee, but nowhere shall they escape the flames.
Restore my Son's Church while there is time.
Return the railings!
Have the people make atonement upon their knees to their God!"
Our Lady, May 30, 1981
Articles...
"Kneel before your God in the Eucharist"
Directives...
D146 - Honor the Eucharist, Part 1
D147 - Honor the Eucharist, Part 2
D161 - The Great Apostasy
D163 - Schism
D198 - Kneel before your God
Links...
Letter on the posture of the people during Mass, Cardinal Medina Estevez, November 7, 2000
Kneeling and Faith in the Eucharist, by Fr. Regis Scanlon
Standing Up for Kneeling during the Liturgy'?, by Fr. Joseph Fessio, S. J. Standing Lip for Kneeling (Catholic Insight - December 1997)
Kneeling (EWTN Library - Winter 1991)
Kneeling after the Lamb of God, (EWTN Library)
Note :
We encourage everyone to print or email copies of this web page to all the Bishops and all the clergy. Also, email or send web page to the news media and as many people as possible: http://www.tldm.org/News5/Vatican_kneeling.htm
"My children, my little humble children, I appeal to you as your Mother, go forward on foot, knock on the doors; bring the light to your brothers and sisters. For those who have been given great grace, much is expected of them."
Our Lady of the Roses, May 26, 1976
"As disciples of the latter days, My children, much shall be asked of you, but I assure you: all that you give in faith and charity shall be returned to you threefold’ Yesus , June 1, 1976
“ My gift to help spread Our Lady of the Roses’ messages to the world.
(3) COMMUNION IN THE HAND?
"Because out of reverence towards this sacrament, nothing touches it, but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest's hands, for touching this sacrament."
St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica
Real Presence
"You violate your sacred trust.
You have taken the Body of your Creator, the Son of your God in the Trinity, and violated Him.
You must do your eating at home!
When you come to the great Sacrifice, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, you come in reverence.
You must go down upon your knees and do penance now for the offenses to your God! ...
"As in the past, cannot you recognize the mystery of Heaven and earth?
Did not the staff of Moses turn into a serpent in the will of God?
Did not the river in Egypt turn into blood in the will of Cod?
And cannot God, in His will, come to you changing the bread and wine into the actual Presence,
the real Presence, the factual Presence of His Body and Blood?"
St. Michael; February 1, 1977
.
Goodness And Love
"You must not take the Body of my Son in your hand!
You open the door for the entrance of evil spirits to defile my Son's Body!
The consecrated fingers of a duly ordained man of God, the priest, shall place my Son into your
mouth, and you must absorb His Body with goodness and love."
Our Lady, March 22, 1975
Sacrilege
"My Son is not pleased with the manner in which His Body and Blood is being given to all
of the humans upon earth.
"Communion in the hand has not been, and will not be accepted by Heaven.
This is a sacrilege in the eyes of the Eternal Father, and must not be continued, for you only add to
your punishment when you continue on in the ways that have been found to be unpleasing to the
Eternal Father."
Our Lady, June 30, 1984
Man Of God
"A priest is a man of God, chosen solely from the world to be a representative of the Son of
God....
As a man of God, he brings to you the Body and Blood of your Savior.
"I tell you, my brothers and sister, that none shall take in his or her hands the purified Body of your Savior! Only the consecrated fingers and hands of the representative of Christ the Lord shall give and bring this gift to mankind!
St. Theresa, October 2, 1975
The Last Supper
“I see a very large mural in the sky now.
It's dark all about it.
And I know it's a plaque; it's like a plaque up here in the sky,
and it shows the twelve apostles during the Last Supper.
I see great sadness in their faces because of the violation of the Host now.
Veronica, September 7, 1977
Sinister Plan
"I ask you, my children--you ask me many times in your prayers-- shall you accept My Son's Body
in your hands? I say no! And no again for reason!
"You cannot judge all those about you, my children, who have accepted this diabolical practice under the
guise of leadership.
No, my children, this was brought about to desecrate my Son, to take from Him the truth of His divine
nature.
No one who hears my voice must accept my Son's Body and Blood in the hands!
The chalice shall turn, and you shall be bathed in His Blood!
" It was, my children, a sinister plan from the depths of hell to remove the knowledge of the divinity of
my Son from among you."
Our Lady, February 10, 1978
Deluded
"Again and again I wander to and fro directing my children to remain close to the Eucharist, the Bread
of life. But do not become misguided: Do not accept my Son's Body in your hands.
"Satan, Lucifer, came as an angel of light and set his agents among the hierarchy of my Son's Church and
deluded them. All manner of abominations are being committed upon my Son's Body now."
Our Lady, July 15, 1978
Blasphemy
"Many are giving My Body in a manner that can only be called blasphemy. Many are accepting My Body in the Eucharist in a manner that defames the Divinity, and also promotes unholiness, paganism, and impurity of heart and actions during the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass."
Jesus, May 26, 1979
Desecration
"My child, you ask why I cry?
I shed tears of great anguish.
I watch anew the desecration to my Son's Body being committed upon earth.
None shall place their hands upon His Body!
"My Son has given you in trust those He has chosen among mankind to represent Him-your priests.
None others shall carry my Son to mankind!
You shall not defile His Body by giving Him into the hands of women, or those that have not been
prepared by the Father as legally-ordained priests in the houses of God-laziness, preoccupied with the world and the pleasures of the flesh!"
Our Lady, November 1, 1974
Purified Fingers
"I ask and repeat that no one handle in unconsecrated hands the Body of my Son!
It will be defiled and discarded, unless only a legally-ordained priest, a man of God, with purified fingers
of the Holy Spirit, give the Body and Blood of my Son to each one under his care."
Our Lady, September 6, 1975
Greatest Sorrow
"The greatest sorrow that smites my heart, my children, is the desecration to my Son's Body.
These abominable acts are being committed by His own in His houses, His churches upon earth.
"I repeat again that none shall bring the sacred Body of my Son, His Body and Blood, to another but a
legally-ordained priest with consecrated hands.
I say, my children, consecrated hands, blessed hands, washed clean by the Holy Spirit!
No man shall render excuses for defilement of my Son's Body."
Our Lady, May 14, 1977
Satanists
All of good spirit and heart will make now a concerted effort to soothe the injured heart of Jesus at the tabernacles of the world.
Communion in the hand was promoted by Satan because of the rise of Satanists now in our country and in the world. They are conducting black mass secretly and openly. The children are the greatest victims of this evil.
The sacred Species, the Host, is being used during these rituals of black mass and Satanism in a most abominable way. Please, Our Lady says, do not accept the Host in your hand.
Do not allow this to be done without an outcry.
Veronica, November 19, 1977
Only Exception
"Only in dire need of death shall a man - I say a man, not a woman or a child-shall a man be given
the power through the legally-ordained priest to bring in urgency and haste the Host to the dying!
"This debasement to My Son's Body shall not go unpunished!
Our Lady, August 21, 1975
Soiled Hands
"No soiled hands can touch my Son's Body. Only God can purify the hands."
Our Lady, September 7, 1970
Unclened Hands
"Look, my child, upon the abominations that have fallen into the cup.
Unclean hands shall stain the Body of your Creator."
St. Michael, September 28, 1973
Accept Gift
"Accept the gift of my Son often, His physical Body, present in your Eucharist--but given to you only
by consecrated hands, hands blessed by my Son and ordained to do His work and represent Him." - Our Lady, February 11, 1971
(4)
COUNCIL OF TRENT
"To omit nothing doctrinal on so important a subject, we now come to speak of the Minister of the
Sacrament, a point, however, on which scarcely anyone is ignorant. The pastor then will teach, that to
priests alone has been given power to consecrate and administer the Holy Eucharist.
That the unvarying practice of the Church has also been, that the faithful receive the Sacrament from
the hand of the priest, and that the priest communicate himself, has been explained by the Council of
Trent; and the same Holy Council has shown that this practice is always to be scrupulously adhered to,
stamped, as it is, with the authoritative, impress of Apostolic tradition, and sanctioned by the illustrious
example of our Lord himself, who, with His own hands, consecrated and gave to His disciples, His most
sacred body.
To Consult as much as possible, for the dignity of this so August a Sacrament, not only is its
administration confided exclusively to the priestly order; but the Church has also, by an express law,
prohibited any but those who are consecrated to religion, unless in case of necessity, to touch the sacred
vessels, the linen or other immediate necessaries for consecration. Priest and people may hence learn,
what piety and holiness they should possess who consecrate, administer, or receive the Holy of Holies." (Council of Trent, Session 13, Chapter 8)
\
MODERNIST AND PROTESTANT REVOLUTIONARIES
WERE BEHIND COMMUNION IN THE HAND...
(Ref. http://www.tldm.org/news7/communioninthehand.htm)
"Communion in the hand has not been, and will not be accepted by Heaven. ",is is a sacrilege in the eyes of the Eternal Father, and must not be continued, for you only add to your punishment when you continue on in the ways that have been found to be unpleasing to the Eternal Father."
Our Lady of the Roses, June 30, 1984
Attack! With the swiftness and coy of a bird sweeping down upon its prey, the so-called reformers of the 1500s charged forward in an effort to strike down the Catholic Church. Their game plan went right to the top, seeking to take out
the Church's centerpiece,
the King of kings,
Jesus Christ in the Eucharist; and
the guardians and dispensers of the hidden Jesus,
the bishops and priests.
In this spiritual chess game, the Masters of mischief included Luther and Bucer in Germany, Calvin and Zwirlgli in Switzerland, Cranmer and Cromwell in England, and other lesser known pawns, who openly attacked belief in the Mystical Body, the Catholic Church and its sacramental system, especially the Eucharistic Jesus.
The masterminds knew that the Church produces the Eucharist, but that the Eucharist also produces the Church in a very special way. Therefore to destroy belief in the Eucharist, is to destroy the Catholic Church. They thought it was high time for their reformed religions to take over, but how to capture the hearts and minds of those who believed in that centerpiece, the hidden Jesus in Eucharist? They knew that if the belief in the Eucharistic Jesus would fall, all of Catholicism would fall.
Their game plan was clear; with fiery words, Martin Bucer, in England at the invitation of Cranmer to help spread the new doctrine, proclaimed in word the following sentiments of the Masters:
"Every superstition of the Roman Antichrist is to be detested ... I have no doubt that this usage of not
putting these sacraments in the hands of the faithful has been introduced out of a double
superstition;
firstly, the false honour they wished to show this sacrament, and
secondly the wicked arrogance of priests claiming greater holiness than that of the people of Christ, by virtue of the oil of consecration.
"I should wish that pastors and teachers of the people should be commanded that each is
faithfully to teach the people that it is superstitious and wicked to think ... that the hands of
the ministers are holier than the hands of the laity; so that it would be wicked, or less fitting,
as was formerly wrongly believed by the ordinary folk ,for the laity to receive these
sacraments in the hand; and therefore that the indications of this wicked belief be
removed-as that the ministers may handle the sacraments, but not allow the laity to do so,
and instead put the sacraments into the mouth-which is not only foreign to what was
instituted by the Lord but offensive to human reason.
"In this way good men will be easily brought to the point of all receiving the sacred
symbols in the hand..."
Needless to say, Cranmer's new 1552 English Communion service devalued the priest and the Eucharist, implementing, among other practices, Communion in the hand. Earlier, Luther had started the practice of Communion in the hand, calling the Catholic belief a "subtle sophistry" and the Catholic Mass as "the greatest and most terrible abomination."
At this time, Cranmer's English Communion service didn't have the Catholic belief either, as he would say himself, "Christ is not received with the mouth but with the heart and entereth by faith." This was the similar doctrine of Zwingli and Calvin and many other so-called reformers throughout Europe as well. Therefore, to promote their own doctrine, the people of the new religions were to become their own minister of the Eucharist. Surely, breaking the long-standing tradition of receiving Jesus from a priest on the tongue would help break down the sensibilities and beliefs of the "ordinary folk." The like occurred in Germany, Switzerland, Holland and other countries throughout Europe. To the Protestant mind the Eucharist was fast becoming just common bread.
Over 400 years later, the crazy 1960s rolled in, and the spirit of Bucer with it: Deja Vu, Back to the Past: Part II. Back to Europe, where this time it is in Holland where the rebellion to Church authority and practice is on the march again.
This time the masterminds of rebellion stay within the visible structure of the Church, and proceed with calculated acts of defiance of mandatory liturgical norms, becoming quite successful. Using "ordinary folk" as their springboard, they convinced them, often under false obedience, to "following their leaders wherever they may go," even outside obedience to Rome. One cannot but hear the words of Bucer echoing, "In that way good men will easily be brought to the point of all receiving the sacred symbols in the hand..."
Others, succumbing out of weakness, following the motto "see no evil, hear no evil," and following the pied piper away from the wisdom of Holy Mother Church. Here, one cannot help but be reminded of the words of St. John Bosco, "The power of evil men lives on the cowardice of the good." Despite being strictly forbidden by Church law, being defined as a grievous offense and mortally wounding, the practice of Communion in the hand is promoted, the wounds of Christ are opened anew, and like a cancer, is spread throughout Hoiland, Belgium, Germany and France. A blitzkrieg of defiance!
Hundreds upon hundreds of years of Catholic teaching on the dignity and the manner of proper respect that needs to be shown toward the Eucharist is in peril. One Just has to look back in history to the 1500s to realize that they were promoting the Protestant practice. This practice was one of the issues the Church responded to in the Council of Trent (1545-1563). In clear terms, the Council declared that receiving Holy Communion from the hands of a priest only was an Apostolic tradition.
We only have to read from the catechism of that Council of Trent to see the mind of the Church:
"It must be taught, then, that to priests alone has been given power to consecrate and
administer to the faithful, the Holy Eucharist. That this has been the unvarying practice of
the Church, that the faithful should receive the Sacrament from the priests, and that the
officiating priests should communicate themselves, has been explained by the Cnnncil of
Trent, which has also shown that this practice as having proceeded from the Apostolic
tradition, is to be religiously retained …’
These words were nothing new, but only reechoing the practice that had developed in the Church under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. For, in the 1200s St. Thomas, in his marvelous work, Summa Theologica, pronounced the same: that it was a priest's job to distribute the Eucharist.
St. Thomas states:
"The dispensing of Christ's Body belongs to the priest for three reasons.
First, because he consecrates in the person of Christ. But as Christ consecrated His Body at the Supper, so also He gave it to others to be partaken of by them. Accordingly, as the consecration of Christ's Body belongs to the priest,
so likewise does the dispensing belong to him.
Secondly, because the priest is the appointed intermediary between God and the people, hence as it belongs to him to deliver the consecrated gifts of the people.
Thirdly, because out of reverence towards this Sacrament, nothing touches
It but what is consecrated, and likewise the priest's hands for touching this
Sacrament.
Hence, it is not lawful for anyone else to touch It, except from necessity, for instance, if it
were to fall upon the ground or else in some other case of urgency."
(Summa Theologica)
The little poor man of Assisi, St. Francis, in his simplicity summed up the Catholic belief,
“And I do this because, here on earth, I see nothing of the Son of the Highest God,
except his most holy Body and Blood, which the priests receive and which only they give to
others. "
And these solemn secrets I will honor and venerate above everything and keep them in the
most sacred places."
(Letter to the Faithful)
We need to reflect here and realized that this profound theology of respect towards the Eucharist that had developed and grown under the guidance of the Holy Spirit from centuries upon centuries. In the early stages of development of the Church, Communion in the hand was permitted but it led to so many abuses that it had to be condemned. Like a child growing into manhood the Church had to develop and come a long way.
As early as Pope St. Leo I (460-461), Communion on the tongue was in current use. The holy Pope stated, "One receives in the mouth what one believes by faith." The great St. Gregory tells us in his dialogues (594-604) how Pope St. Agapitus performed a miracle during the Mass after having introduced the Body of our Lord into the mouth of a person: "When he placed the Lord's Body in his mouth, the tongue which had so long been speechless was loosed, all those present were struck with wonder and wept for joy." (Dialogue 3, 117)
A local council in Rouen, France in 650 condemned Communion in the hand: "Do not put the Eucharist in the hands of any layman or laywoman but only in their mouths."
In the 9th century, the Roman Ordo clearly admits to the fact of Communion on the tongue as the normal practice.
Under the cloak that we are "gloriously returning to the spirit of ancient times," many modern innovators of the 60s sought to bring people to primitive practices, as Communion in the hand. As this thought was already seeping into the Church in the 1940s, the great Pope Pius XII reacted strongly against this in his famous encyclical Mediator Dei (1947). In this document, he warned against such people who attempt to undermine the faith under such a pretext, saying such persons represent "a wicked movement that tends to paralyze the sanctifying and salutary action by which the liturgy leads the children of adoption on the path to their Heavenly Father."
Moreover, the Holy Father goes on in this same document, "the desire to restore everything indiscriminately to its ancient condition is neither wise nor praiseworthy. It would be wrong, for example, to want the altar restored to its ancient form of a table ... and pictures and statues excluded from our churches ... This attitude is an attempt to revive the `archeologism' ... which the Church ... has rightly condemned."
If Pope Pius XII's words were not enough, Cardinal Newman's words should stop any innovator in their tracks. In his book The Development of Christian Doctrine he exclaimed that "a developed doctrine which reverses the course of development which has proceeded it, is not true development but a corruption; also that which is corrupt acts as an element of unhealthiness towards what is sound."
Today, polls show that only 30% of U.S. Catholics believe in the Church's teaching on the Eucharist. THIRTY PERCENT! Did the practice of Communion in the hand have anything to do with this loss of belief in the Eucharist? Surely, Martin Bucer would like to have thought so.
Clearly, during the Vatican II Council, 1962-1965, there was no change in the Church's tradition of receiving on the tongue from a priest. This ancient practice was retained as nothing was declared to the contrary. Most definitely, if we truly followed Vatican II, there would be no Communion in the hand. Furthermore, in this same time period, the Canon Law in use since 1917 declared,
"The priest alone is the ordinary Minister of Holy Communion. The deacon is the extraordinary
minister, but he must have the permission of the local Ordinary or of the pastor, which may be
given for grave reason, and may be legitimately presumed in case of necessity." (Canon 845)
Additionally, the 1962 book The Administration of the Sacraments, imprimatured by Cardinal Cushing, points out that if a deacon gives out Holy Communion without permission under normal circumstances he would be "sinning grievously." With all of the Church's might against such a practice, one can only wonder in amazement how this practice of Communion in the hand got its foothold today.
His Holiness Pope Paul VI saw the dangers of this rebellion of the 1960s challenging him, and looked to the world's bishops to support him. The Holy Father sent out a questionnaire to the bishops of the world to see if they felt as he did on this serious matter. The results that were in before March 12th of 1969 read:
567 bishops voting yes on Communion in the hand;
1,233 voting no on Communion in the hand,
315 of those yes votes with reservation.
Great news for the Pope, as it was overwhelmingly rejected by majority of the bishops. However, on the not so good side, the rebellious practice was growing day by day-the spirit of Bucer was alive!
Feeling the pressure of the situation, and afraid of losing his hold on the affair-which was clearly happening-Pope Paul VI sought to set things right by bringing forth a new instruction, ‘Memoriale Domini’ May 29, 1959. Bringing to light the bishops' vote, the Holy Father's instruction reads,
"From the responses it is thus clear that by far the greater number of bishops feel that the present
discipline should not be changed at all, indeed, that if it were changed, this WOULD BE OFFENSIVE to the sensibilities and spiritual appreciation of these bishops and of most of the faithful." (emphasis added)
Further, showing how he himself feels, the noted document states, "the Supreme Pontiff judged that the long-received manner of ministering Ho!y Commur.ion to the faithful SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED. The Apostolic See therefore strongly urges bishops, priests and people to observe zealously this law." (!)
Moreover, in this document, the Holy Father admits Communion in the hand is an abuse! When talking about the practice, the document states, "In some communities and localities this rite (of receiving Communion in the hands) has even been performed WITHOUT OBTAINING
THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE APOSTOLIC SEE...."
Bingo! Here is the admittance that Communion in the hand is truly an abuse. and, by the way, is still objectively and grievously sinful at this time. Before we go forward, let us ponder on the Scripture passage, "By their fruits you shall know them." (Matt. 7:17)
‘Memoriale Domini’ was to forbid the bishops from the countries where Communion in the hand wasn’t in vogue, to start the practice up. However, puzzling indeed, the Holy Father perhaps feeling a bit overwhelmed or at least, overly optimistic that the right thing would be done in this spiritual chess game, tragically drops his guard, and leaves an opening for the new way of thinking:
"If the contrary usage, namely, of placing Holy Communion in the hand, has already
developed in any place, in order to help the Episcopal Conference fulfill their pastoral office in
today's often difficult situation, the Apostolic See entrusts to the conferences the duty and
function of judging particular circumstances, if any."
The Holy Father, however, did lay down serious restrictions for this indult:
"They may make this judgment -PROVIDED THAT ANY DANGER IS AVOIDED OF
INSUFFICIENT REVERENCE OR FALSE OPINION OF THE HOLY EUCHARIST-
arising in the minds of the faithful and that any other improprieties be carefully removed."
Could one not ask, by carrying out the practice that was grievously forbidden, wasn't the danger already too great? Astonishingly, an open abuse is not corrected, but keys to the house , the left with many known-to-be robbers of legitimate authority. The Holy Father apparently was just hoping and praying, in his goodness of heart, that the right thing would be done. The door is opened wider.
Again, let us take notice once more of the Holy Father's previous statement in this document: "THE SUPREME PONTIFF JUDGED THAT THE LONG RECEIVED MANNER OF MINISTERING HOLY COMMUNION TO THE FAITHFUL SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED." This is the Holy Father's wish, however, as history points out, the Holy Father does not always get his wish. We can see from this statement, that Pope Paul VI's will is that all receive on the tongue. Most notably, he himself, until his death, would forbid the practice of Holy Communion in the hands in the Eternal City of Rome and all of Italy. Still, one can only ask how a practice that the Pope was personally opposed to, came to be.
The spirit of Bucer began to spread. This new practice of receiving Holy Communion in the hand posed serious questions for the Catholic, and left many confused and weakened in faith towards the Eucharist. People, who had been taught from childhood good theological reasons why never ... never to touch the Host, except in a big emergency, were now told the opposite. During this time frame Catholics by the droves stopped attending the great Eucharistic mystery, and stopped believing in the hidden Jesus.
In reading the document carefully, you will see serious fatherly warnings coming from the Holy Father, who was afraid that this would be the case:
“Communion in the hand " carries with it certain dangers:
the danger of loss of reverence for the August Sacrament of the Altar;
of profanation;
of adulteration of true doctrine."
In contrast, the Holy Father communicated the fact that ‘Holy Communion received on the tongue’ "signifies the reverence of the faithful for the Eucharist ...
provides that Holy Communion will be distributed with due reverence ...
is more conducive to Faith, Reverence, and Humility ..
Detracts nothing from the personal dignity of those who approach so great a Sacrament ...
provides that the diligent care commended by the Church for even the fragments of the Consecrated
Bread be maintained."
What can we say? We can say that Communion on the tongue is the law of the Church even today. Communion in the hand is an indult which can only be allowed if the conditions of the indult are met.
In the document ‘Memoriale Domini’ itself, we saw one condition of the indult that the bishops can only make judgments for the indult "provided that any danger is avoided of insufficient reverence or false opinion of the Eucharist..." This is a condition that must be met; but the question in today's unbelieving, uncatechized world is, can it?
Further, and very importantly, there is a little-known instruction issued after ‘Memoriale Domini’, as can be found in the Acta Apostolica Sedis (pp. 546-547), given to the hierarchies who asked for and are granted permission to introduce the practice of Communion in the hand The letter laid down seven conditions, of which - for brevity - we will concentrate on four. Please remember, Communion on the tongue is still the universal law, and Communion in the hand is only allowable when the conditions of the indult are met. Of these seven conditions, four seem to need special consideration for the indult:
1. "The new manner of giving Communion must not be imposed in such a way that the
traditional practice is excluded...";
2. "The rite of giving Holy Communion in the hand must not be used without discretion ...
the result ... must be such as to exclude any appearance that the Church is weakening
in any way her faith in the Eucharistic presence, and such that there is no danger of
profanation or even the appearance of danger of profanation."
3. "The possibility offered to the faithful to receive in his hand and to put in his mouth the
Eucharistic Bread must not offer to him an occasion of considering It to be like ordinary
bread or something merely blessed; on the contrary..."
4. "... one must take care to not drop or lose any particles of the Eucharistic Bread, one must
also take care to see the hands are suitably clean..."
Now, somebody has to decide if these conditions can be met, and this decision is often left up to the priest.
He must answer these $128,000 questions: is every occasion or possibility of scandal going to be avoided, and is "all danger of irreverence towards the Eucharist" avoided?
He, as pastor of the flock must see to it that no abuse of Our Lord will occur, that no lost particles will result, and that the faithful's belief in the Eucharist will be strengthened rather than weakened. He has an obligation to weigh these factors out, with the utmost charity.
Every particle contains Jesus Christ's Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity. Therefore, the loss of any particle would be sacrilegious. By ecclesiastical law, the priest is the minister and is responsible for the distribution of the Eucharist. Therefore, with great love, the priest must care for the Body of Christ and nourish the faithful, seeing that every particle is consumed. Simply put, he must see if this indult can be met. Again, the priest and the faithful must ask (considering today's confusion and lack of true teaching on the Eucharist), could these conditions possibly be met?
Nevertheless, in America, as in other places, under false obedience many nuns and others were misled and told they had to take the Host in the hand. Some liberal publication falsely stated it was the wish of the Pope that this be done. The children were told, "take It in the hand." With all that the children have not been told concerning the Eucharist, no wonder few believe in the Real Presence of Jesus. Through these methods, we can see Martin Brucer’s spirit is alive in deed. His words echo in our century, "in that way good men will be easily brought to the point of all receiving the sacred symbols in the hand..."
PRIESTLY RUBRICS
Following are the rubrics that priests of yesterday always followed, and what some priests still do today:
"In the smallest particle of the sacramental species the whole Christ is present.
On the belief in this truth numerous liturgical usages and ordinances are founded, all conducing to
prevent and avoid, with the greatest and almost scrupulous care, the slightest profanation of the
smallest portion of the Sacred Host or of a single drop of the Eucharistic Blood.
After the consecration, therefore, the thumb and the fore finger must continually be held together, and
as often as they touch the Sacred Host, be purified over the chalice.
For this reason it is that after Communion the fragments on the corporal and paten must be so carefully
Collected, and chalice and hands be well cleansed”
(The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, Rev. Nicholas Gihr)
Nevertheless, what was left to Pope John Paul II when he came to reign, was a practice firmly entrenched. Soon after being elected Pope, the Holy Father visited the United States where an event took place that showed his own feelings on the manner of receiving Holy Communion. What the television cameras captured was a nun attempting to receive Holy Communion with her hands stretched forward, whereas the picture focused in on the Holy Father instructing her to receive Jesus on her tongue. During that journey to our country the Holy Father stuck to his guns, and did not give Holy Communion in the hands. In time, however-feeling pressure untold no doubt-the Holy Father was to give in to the demands of others. However, Pope John Paul II was to maintain his principle of no Communion in the hand in Rome until the late 1980s. For many a year, the sign over St. Peter's Basilica read in five different languages:
"By superior instruction it is herewith confirmed that the Most Reverend priests who
celebrate or administer in this Basilica of St. Peter's must not put the most Sacred
Particles in the hands of the faithful."
Regardless of what the sign read, foreign priests often ignored the rules, and did their own thing. Communion in the hand became so widespread in the Eternal City, that it was eventually allowed.
Of this Holy Father, it is all too clear of his preference for Communion on the tongue. In his Apostolic Letter ‘Dominicae Cenae’ on February 1980, Pope John Paul II noted that since the introduction of Communion in the hand
"cases of a deplorable lack of respect towards the Eucharistic species have been reported,
cases which are imputable not only to the individuals guilty of such behavior, but also to the pastors of the Church who have not been vigilant enough regarding the attitude of the faithful towards the Eucharist."
The Holy Father further shows his preference in a more direct way in that same instruction, stating:
"The rite of the anointing of the hands in our Latin ordination, as though precisely for these
hands a special grace and power of the Holy Spirit is necessary! To touch the sacred species,
and to distribute them with their own hands, is a privilege of the ordained, one which
indicates an active participation in the ministry of the Eucharist."
Mother Teresa of Calcutta has seen to it that her community's practice is to receive Holy Communion only on the tongue. Surely she sees, as Pope Paul VI did, that this traditional manner of receiving the Holy Eucharist on the tongue "is more conducive to Faith, Reverence and Humility."
Ultimately, the Holy Father has had such grave misgivings about what has become of practices regarding the Eucharist, that he ended his letter ‘Domirlicae Cenae’ with these words:
"And I pray the Lord Jesus that in the future we may avoid in our manner of dealing with this
sacred mystery anything which could weaken or disorient in any way the sense of reverence and
love that exists in our faithful people."
"We ask and repeat that no one handle in unconsecrated hands the Body of my Son! It will
be defiled and discarded, unless only a legally-ordained priest, a man of God, with purified
fingers of the Holy Spirit, give the Body and Blood of my Son to each one under his care." - Our Lady of the Roses, September 6, 1975
Our Lady of the Roses awesome Bayside Prophecies...
These prophecies came from Jesus, Mary, and the saints to Veronica Lueken at Bayside, NY, from 1968 to 1995.
Real Presence
"You violate your sacred trust.
You have taken the Body of your Creator, the Son of your God in the Trinity, and violated Him.
You must do your eating at home!
When you come to the great Sacrifice, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, you come in reverence.
You must go down upon your knees and do penance now for the offenses to your God! ...
"As in the past, cannot you recognize the mystery of Heaven and earth?
Did not the staff of Moses turn into a serpent in the will of God?
Did not the river in Egypt turn into blood in the will of God?
And cannot God, in His will, come to you changing the bread and wine into the actual Presence,
the real Presence, the factual Presence of His Body and Blood?"
St. Michael, February 1, 1977
Goodness And Love
"You must not take the Body of my Son in your hand!
You open the door for the entrance of evil spirits to defile my Son's Body!
The consecrated fingers of a duly ordained man of God, the priest, shall place my Son into your mouth,
and you must absorb His Body with goodness and love."
Our Lady, March 22, 1975
Sacrilege
"My Son is not pleased with the manner in which His Body and Blood is being given to all of the
humans upon earth.
"Communion in the hand has not been, and will not be accepted by Heaven.
This is a sacrilege in the eyes of the Eternal Father, and must not he continued, for you only add to
your punishment when you continue on in the ways that have been found to be unpleasing to the
Eternal Father."
Our Lady. June 30, 1984
Man of God
"A priest is a man of God, chosen solely from the world to be a representative of the Son of God....
As a man of God, he brings to you the Body and Blood of your Savior.
" I tell you, my brothers and sister, that none shall take in his or her hands the purified Body of your
Savior! Only the consecrated fingers and hands of the representative of Christ the Lord shall give
and bring this gift to mankind!
St. Theresa, October 2, 1975
The Last Supper
“ I see a very large mural in the sky now. It's dark all about it.
And I know it's a plaque; it's like a plaque up here in the sky, and
it shows the twelve apostles during the Last Supper.
I see great sadness in their faces because of the violation of the Host now”
Veronica - September 7, 1977
Sinister Plan
"I ask you, my children--you ask me many times in your prayers, shall you accept my Son's Body in
the guise of leadership.
No, my children, this was brought about to desecrate my Son, to take from Him the truth of His divine
nature.
No one who hears my voice must accept my Son's Body and Blood in the hands!
The chalice shall turn, and you shall be bathed in His Blood!
"It was, my children, a sinister plan from the depths of hell to remove the knowledge of the divinity of
my Son from among you."
Our Lady, February 10, 1978
Deluded
"Again and again I wander to and fro directing my children to remain close to the Eucharist, the
Bread of life.
But do not become misguided: Do not accept my San's Body in your hands.
"Satan, Lucifer, came as an angel of light and set his agents among the hierarchy of my Son's Church
and deluded them. All manner of abominations are being committed upon my Son's Body now."
Our Lady, July 15, 1978
Blasphemy
"Many are giving My Body in a manner that can only be called blasphemy.
Many are accepting My Body in the Eucharist in a manner that defames the Divinity,
and also promotes unholiness, paganism, and impurity of heart and actions during the Holy Sacrifice of
the Mass."
Jesus, May 26, 1979
Desecration
"My child, you ask why I cry?
I shed tears of great anguish.
I watch anew the desecration to my Son's Body being committed upon earth.
None shall place their hands upon His Body!
"My Son has given you in trust those He has chosen among mankind to represent Him-your priests.
None others shall carry my Son to mankind!
You shall not defile His Body by giving Him into the hands of women, or those that have not been
prepared by the Father as legally-ordained priests in the houses of God-laziness, preoccupied with the
world and the pleasures of the flesh!"
Our Lady, November 1, 1974
Referances:
1. “Directives from Heaven...” http://www.tldm.orgldirectives/directives.htm
2. Articles ...
2.1. Communion in the hand should be rejected, by Dietrich von Hildebrand
http://www.tldm.org/News6/von-Hildebrand.htm
2.3. Fr. John Hardon speaks out against Communion in the hand
http://www.tldm.org/News7/Hardon.htm
2.3. What the holy ones say about receiving Jesus
http://wvw.tldm.org/News6G/holy-ones.htm
2.4. Re-thinking Communion in the hand
http://wwv.tldlm.org/nevvs2/cih.htm
2.5. More reasons for rejection Communion in the hand
http://www.tldm.org/News5/CinH2.htm
2.6. Bishop Laise speaks out against Communion in the hand
http.://www.tldm.org/News6/Laise.htm
2.7. Communion in the Hand: Documents and History (Bishop Juan Rodolfo Laise)
http://www.tldm.org/News4/BishopLaise.htm
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar